You are not authorized to access this page. Log in with your UVic account to access restricted material, or email speccoll@uvic.ca to request access.
pp_187
File Details
- Depositor
- Karen Dykes
- Date Uploaded
- 2021-12-09
- Date Modified
- 2021-12-09
- Fixity Check
- passed on August 08, 2024 at 14:06
- Characterization
-
Height: 2782Width: 1885File Format: tiff (Tagged Image File Format)File Size: 15757826Filename: 7183_pp_187.tifLast Modified: 2025-08-27T00:40:32.441ZOriginal Checksum: 69b418ef44853391ae4f5d18791994e7Mime Type: image/tiff
- The primary concern so far has been rats. Beavers will probably answer to the same technique but fine fur, especially fox is different again. I doubt whether any attempt should be made to register white fox lines. Some one suggested leaving the main chanels [channels] open for general fox trapping. Apparently the Tuk [Tuktoyaktuk] natives are now finding themselves without rat areas. Why not permit ratting + even fox trapping with traps not larger than 1 1/2 on the Reindeer reserves + apportion these areas to Tuk [Tuktoyaktuk] + outer coast residents. One long lake R1 on map just N.W [Northwest] of Tunnunuk [Tununuk] is said to have produced 500 rats. When registration is introduced each trapper should be given a map of his area + be provided with a quantity of boundary signs. Aklavik June 21 Had a talk with McLeod of Hudson Bay Co [Company]. He states that price for shot rats is 25% lower than trapped rats because they are
| User Activity | Date |
|---|---|
| No user activity | |